Saturday, October 07, 2006

Racism at CBS Chicago

A letter to CBS7 Chicago:

I recently watched a couple of shows on TiVo (so these are from roughly a week ago), and caught a couple of "upcoming news previews" concerning a proposed illegal immigrant ordinance in Carpentersville. One was done by Diann Burns, and the other by Antonio Mora. I forget Mr. Mora's exact wording, but Ms. Burns' comment was about an ordinance that would supposedly "ban Hispanics" from a local town. Mr. Mora's comment was roughly the same.

Aside from making completely inaccurate descriptions of the Carpentersville proposal, I am disgusted by the blatant display of racism from both of your anchors. To assume that all Hispanics are in this country illegally is the height of ignorance. Worse yet is the portrayal of those opposed to illegal immigration as racist, as Mr. Mora and Ms. Burns themselves propagate an ignorant, racist lie.

Mr. Mora and Ms. Burns are a disgrace to your newsroom.
Apparently CBS7 (Wow. Imagine that. The network of Dan Rather!) feels that calling others racist is more important than accurately reporting the news.

From the Chicago Tribune:
In what experts said was a first for the Chicago area, two Carpentersville trustees have proposed that the village punish landlords and businesses that "aid and abet" illegal immigrants.
...
Their ordinance would deny business permits and village contracts for any employer who hired undocumented workers. It also would fine landlords $1,000 for knowingly renting property to illegal immigrants.


Notice. Nothing about punishing those who hire or rent to Hispanics.

Friday, May 26, 2006

To Senators Durbin and Obama

Specifically. Also to any Senator that voted for immigration "reform."

Dear Senator,

This is regarding your recent vote on immigration reform, specifically Senator Dodd's amendment S.Amdt.4089.

When you joined the US Senate, you took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States. I am including that oath here for reference:
==
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
==

Senator Dodd's amendment states, among other things, that Mexico shall be consulted regarding any "additional fencing and related border security structures" along our southern border.

I would remind you again that you took an oath to support and defend the US Constitution.

Where in the Constitution does it say that we must confer with foreign nations about our border security? Where does the Constitution say that we must consult with foreign nations before passing laws? Where does the Constitution say that we must consult with foreign nations regarding our immigration procedures?

Whom do you represent, Senator?

American citizens? Or a bunch of foreigners?

Thank you

Letter is released to the public domain. Copy and modify as you see fit.

Here's the relevant text of Sen Dodd's amendment:

(b) CONSULTATION REQUIREMENT.--Consultations between United States and Mexican authorities at the federal, state, and local levels concerning the construction of additional fencing and related border security structures along the United States-Mexico border shall be undertaken prior to commencing any new construction, in order to solicit the views of affected communities, lessen tensions and foster greater understanding and stronger cooperation on this and other important issues of mutual concern.

Saturday, April 01, 2006

Kubuntu Stuff

Penguin Liberation Front:
PLF & win32 codecs
PLF Main Site

Fix Konqueror Menus:
Kubuntu FAQ
Kubuntu Breezy comes with a simplified Konqueror profile to make things more use friendly compared to default KDE.
To get back to the default KDE profiles:
sudo rm -r /usr/share/kubuntu-default-settings/kde-profile/default/share/apps/konqueror
sudo cp /usr/share/apps/konqueror/konqueror-orig.rc /usr/share/apps/konqueror/konqueror.rc
Still a bit unclear as to how the default Kubuntu menus are actually less confusing and easier to use...

nvidia
$ sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings
$ sudo nvidia-glx-config enable
Then...$ sudo vi /etc/X11/xorg.conf and comment (#) out the lines "Load GLCore" and "Load dri". Logout of KDE, CTRL+ALT+BKSP. See pretty nvidia logo screen. Play DooM.

Friday, March 31, 2006

SlashPink!



Ok.

This is definately one of the better slashdot April Fool's gags.

Preserved here for posterity.

Don't Belive Everything You Read in the NYTImes

So first, Dan Rather and Mary Mapes give us the fake Bush National Guard memos.
Now, in an article by titled "Judges on Secretive Panel Speak Out on Spy Program", the New York Times provides this little snippet (emphasis added):
Five former judges on the nation's most secretive court...urged Congress on Tuesday to give the court a formal role in overseeing the [NSA] surveillance program.
In a rare glimpse into the inner workings of the secretive court, known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, several former judges who served on the panel also voiced skepticism at a Senate hearing about the president's constitutional authority to order wiretapping on Americans without a court order. They also suggested that the program could imperil criminal prosecutions that grew out of the wiretaps.

However, reading the transcripts, it is clear that the FISA court judges raised anything but skepticism over the NSA program.
A few snippits from the hearing (emphasis added):

  • Judge Kornblum: As you know, in Article I, Section 8, Congress has enumerated powers as well as the power to legislate all enactments necessary and proper to their specific authorities, and I believe that is what the President has, similar authority to take executive action necessary and proper to carry out his enumerated responsibilities of which today we are only talking about surveillance of Americans.

  • Judge Kornblum (asked whether a law can infringe (or limit, change, etc) a President's Constitutional powers): I think--as a Magistrate Judge, not a District Judge, that a President would be remiss in exercising his Constitutional authority to say that, "I surrender all of my power to a statute," and, frankly, I doubt that Congress, in a statute, can take away the President's authority, not his inherent authority, but his necessary and proper authority.

  • Judge Stafford (same question): Everyone is bound by the law, but I do not believe, with all due respect, that even an act of Congress can limit the President's power under the Necessary and Proper Clause under the Constitution.
  • From (one of) Our moronic Senators from Illinois (Durbin AKA Turbin Durbin):

    Senator Durbin: Well, as we have heard it described--and I have not been briefed either, there are only a few Senators who have--it is the interception of domestic communications between people in the United States and those in foreign lands, and that strikes me as falling within the four corners of the FISA law as written.

    Judge Keenan: But you use the word in your introductory question and in that question, "domestic," and as I understand from the lay press, again, this is international, it is not domestic. So that's why I'm not in a position to answer, sir. (Ed: In other words, you blowhard, it is NOT a DOMESTIC SPYING PROGRAM! You even said so yourself: "between people in the United States and those in foreign lands." Sheesh.)

    Judge Baker: Senator, did the statute limit the President? You created a balance between them [in the FISA statute], and I don't think it took away the inherent authority that Judge Kornblum talked about.

  • And on the admissibility of information in a court of law:

    Judge Kornblum: To be admissible, the evidence would have had to have been lawfully seized or lawfully obtained and the standard that the district judge would use is that, depending upon where this is, is the law in his circuit. In most of the circuits, the law is clear that the President has the authority to do warrantless surveillance if it is to collect foreign intelligence and it is targeting foreign powers or agents. If the facts support that, then the district judge could make that finding and admit the evidence, just as they did in Truong-Humphrey.


Well, seems to me from the transcripts, that the judges actually, for the most part, presented a case that the NSA program is entirely legal. Not even close to what the NYT reported.

Links:
Powerline
Powerline
Powerline
The New York Times
Hearing Transcript

The internet is now officially providing better, more accurate news than the Old Media.
And they wonder why circulation numbers are dropping.

SUV Terrorist

Random thought:
Shouldn't the media and Democrats be playing up this guy who drove his SUV into a bunch of people in the name of Allah? After all, here is a case of a terrorist attack on US soil! Bush didn't protect us! What good are the Patriot Act and the NSA if Bush still can't protect us?!

Thursday, January 05, 2006

AllPeers: The Firefox Killer Ap

Now this is just plain cool.

AllPeers

Basically, it's a Firefox extension that allows you to share files with "Buddy List." ie: Set up family members as peers, and then select pictures, etc to share with them.

Kinda like a mini-private-Napster+.

On a somewhat related note, Flock certainly has some interesting potentials as well.